RSS

Posts Tagged ‘conservatism’

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
- Supr10421991_saeme Court Nominee, Sonya Sotomayor

This statement on its face should cause all American’s grave concern.  Just change one word … replace the word “Latina” with “White” and the word “white” with the word “Latina” and the main stream media would completely eviscerate the nominee charging racism, lack of sensitivity, poor judgment and surely much worse.

In a 2005 panel discussion at Duke University, Sotomayor told students that the Federal Court of Appeals is where “policy is made.” She said:

“Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know, and I know, that this is on tape, and I should never say that. Because we don’t ‘make law,’ I know. [Audience laughter] Okay, I know. I know. I’m not promoting it, and I’m not advocating it. I’m, you know. [Audience laughter] Having said that, the Court of Appeals is where, before the Supreme Court makes the final decision, the law is percolating. Its interpretation, its application.”

As a judicial activist, she jokingly admits “making policy” from the bench.  I ask what about separation of powers, The Constitution of the United States and limited government.  The Supreme Court and the Justice System is charged with applying and interpreting the law, not making the law.  It makes me feel, as a citizen, pretty sour to hear this level of cynicism or sarcasm when referring to the role of the courts, particularly where it is diametrically opposed to the Constitution.

On Face the Nation, this morning, Senator Dianne Feinstein said that there is only one word that is wrong with the first quote; the word is “better” … and she says she feels like she knows what she meant and then goes on to not actually say what she felt she meant.  I don’t know what she meant?  I can only read or listen to what she actually says in the context of what she says.  Feinstein then goes on to pontificate about what a great story she has referring to her life, her environment, accomplishments and career.  While I am sure that the life of Sotomayor is a great and compelling story, it has little to do with choosing the very best Supreme Court Justice available; Latina, White, Black, Jew, Gentile, Atheist, Man or Woman.  There are many great and compelling life stories.  These factors should have nothing to do with the choice simply because all have a great life story with long and distinguished careers.

Sotomayor will surely be confirmed.  Democrats will rubber stamp President Obama’s choice and not take on their Constitutional responsibility to “Advise and Consent.”
If Judge Roberts was confirmed who said the Supreme Court should be a neutral umpire, then how can we not have serious, sober debate about statements that are complete contradictions to Constitutional Law and the words of existing confirmed Justices.  This is not to say that there cannot be differences between Justices; however, we are talking here of basic elements of the Constitution that cannot / should not be debated appropriately, unless, we were to call for a new Constitutional Convention.

Possibly more importantly, what does this nomination say about President Obama?  President Obama used the word “empathy” or being able to put yourself in someone else’s shoes as an important consideration in his choice.  There is no elaboration from Obama.  But when Sotomayor said in her writings that she felt in most cases people cannot be expected to rule out their background in judging cases, you cannot ignore linkage from President Obama’s statement on empathy in his choice.

In Obama’s weekly radio address, he warned against a long confirmation battle and urged consideration of her qualifications, background, etc and not prolong Senate approval.  However, Senator Obama led the filibuster attempts against the nomination of Judge Alito who clearly had the background, qualifications et al.  Senator Obama argued against the idea of just rubber stamping the President’s choice just based on intellect and “whether or not he is nice to his wife.”  So we have the latest example of double standards, cheap politics, and hypocrisy coming from Washington.  Change you can believe in … yeah, sure.

It is chilling to this writer how radical this President has proven to be.

So, what do you think of this nomination and what do you think this says about President Obama?  Your comments are welcome … always.

Arthur Cooper

31 May 2009

Sotomayor and Obama

Author: admin | Filed under: Government, Politics, The Media

obamafree1In a speech at a fundraiser in Beverly Hills last night, President Obama emphatically affirmed his policies and approach telling the friendly and exuberant audience that we have stepped back from the brink referring to the economy.  Seeming to believe that the news is better, Obama rallied the crowd by saying “you ain’t seen nothing yet.”

So, Obama is starting to claim some measure of success.  He says that things are calmer now.  The only thing that is calmer is the main stream media because they don’t have a heart attack anymore over every poor economic number because they can’t continue blaming Bush for it.  How can Obama claim success?  Consider:

                • - Unemployment Rate is at a 25 year high
                  - More Americans are collecting unemployment than ever.
                  - One out 7 mortgages in foreclosure.
                  - Thousands of Auto Dealerships being shut down.
                  - The Dollar is dropping (losing value) due to the skyrocketing increase of the money supply courtesy of the Bush-Obama “Bail Out Nation,”

Now, I ask:

1.    Where are the shovel-ready jobs?
2.    Where and how is the $800 billion stimulus being spent?
3.    Where is the $1 Trillion in supplemental spending being used to benefit America?
4.    What evidence is there that a single job has been created as a result of the stimulus bill?

When President Obama says “you ain’t seen nothing yet” it doesn’t give much hope for conservatives that we will be getting “limited government” as is prescribed in the US Constitution anytime soon.  It is just chilling to think what he does have in store for America.  We already know that he is pushing forward at breakneck speed on Universal Healthcare, Cap and Trade and Saving the Planet.  What else is in store for America?

However, I suggest that Obama hasn’t seen anything yet.  His policies will prove to be a disaster simply on the basis of a few simple indisputable facts:

1.    Increasing Taxes has never actually improved the economy.  When the average American sees virtually everything they buy or do go shooting higher in price, Obama will and must pay a heavy political price.

2.    Massive Spending Increases - regardless of the purpose or the intent, massive government spending, using solely borrowed money, robs the private economy of needed capital and crowds out private industry.
3.    Nationalization of major sections of our economy; the government now controls major chunks of the banking industry and automobile industry … soon the government will seek to finalize a plan that essentially boasts “Medicare for Everyone.”  There is no history that shows government control of anything, with the exception of our national defense, has proven to be an unmitigated failure.
4.    Obama claimed transparency in all areas of government, yet, there is no transparency and there is no “seat at the table” as was advertised.  Someone, probably not the mainstream media, will point this out and will get through to mainstream America.
And where are the Republicans?  Nowhere!  Where are the true conservatives who can propose and effectively communicate supply-side economics, economic and tax policy that is based on incentives and not on entitlement?  Where are the true constitutionalists that limit the power and control of government in subservience to the individual?

These are indeed difficult times.  The inevitable response (and it is inevitable), will come from the grass roots.  We have seen the tea parties.  We need to see more.  They need to be larger and louder.  We need to demand better.  We need to truly recognize what the Constitution stands for and it is ultimately up to the individual to reassert individual rights and responsibilities.  It is up to the individual to reassert himself and reverse the growth in government control of our lives.

So, tell me what you think.  What does the Constitution mean to you?  What do Obama’s policies mean to you?  Let’s air this stuff out.  It’s important!

Arthur Cooper

diablo-dems-discuss-california-propositionsOn Tuesday, California voters sent a resounding and complete rejection of new and confiscatory taxes on a whole range of Propositions. Too bad all states couldn’t do the same thing through this process of voting on specific proposed increases in spending and taxes.  California has been a very “blue” state voting for liberal and democratic politicians, particularly over the past 15 years.  Tax increases on income, sales, property, etc were all defeated on Tuesday.  These were not squeaker votes; they were all landslides with 60%+ plurality.  So Hurray for California, hurray for limited government and hurray for the individual … FINALLY!

California has sent the strongest message yet that REAL PEOPLE, though they may still like the style of President Obama, when it comes down to our daily lives and the reality of bigger government, controlling government, the country is really CONSERVATIVE on the ground.

Have no doubt about this:  Obama, Reid, Pelosi and their ideology will be proven to be wrong, dangerous and detrimental to the country.  Many who voted for Obama thought he was bringing to us a new day of change.  However, it will become clearer and clearer, as the facts on the ground become evident, that raising taxes whether it is through income taxes, cap and trade, nationalizing health care, dictating to private industry and assuming more and more control of the individual are not in the interest of the country and the individual himself.

It was interesting and ironic that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wasn’t even in California on the day of decision by its citizens.  He was in Washington DC, with President Obama, taking accolades for policies, initiatives and actions that do nothing but seek to control our lives.  Specifically, Obama was praising the “governator” for California’s Auto Standards, environmental initiatives, etc.  This is what Obama seeks for the entire country, despite the fact that these kinds of standards, initiatives and plain command and control of everything that they can get their hands on, has created one of the greatest financial crises in history.  California is in deep deep trouble.  President Obama is following California’s lead.  All Americans are witness to this and are certainly beginning to see the cause and effect.  The fact is, those that have been successful in California are leaving the state in droves.  The same is also happening in all of the high tax states like New York, New Jersey, Michigan, etc.  States like Texas, Nevada, Florida are gaining new citizens as a result … they DON’T TAX INCOME and their property taxes are very low, at least by comparison.

While high tax states are the losers so will the United States be the loser as we drive CAPITAL, the lifeblood of free markets and commerce, away from our shores.  This is happening and will continue to happen as long as government continues to treat capital badly.  When you tax investment gains, corporate profits, etc, private capital seeks a better place.  The better places include Singapore, China et al that do not tax capital or corporate profits.  As capital leaves to other countries that welcome capital and just plain treat it better, each and every one of us will suffer.
However, the citizens in California have sent the first real message of rejection to policies that can only lead to failure and hardship.  This same state voted overwhelmingly for Obama just 6+ months ago.  What has changed?  One word … REALITY.  The same is destined to happen across the nation as the realities of what President Obama’s changes will mean to the lives of individuals.  When your utility bills whether it is oil, gas, electric, and hot water all skyrocket through Cap and Trade … all in the name of global warming … you will see what this all means to you.  This carbon-based tax will significantly increase the price everyone pays for everything from gasoline to food and anything that uses carbon-based energy sources in the manufacturing and distribution process.

Likewise, when you see your personal choices are limited or removed by the government in virtually every aspect of your lives including health care, automobile purchases, financial services including credit cards and loans, etc, you too will ultimately reject these assaults on your personal freedom and liberty.  Rather than change, you will come to realize that this is only the reemergence and acceleration of the long term trend of government to command and control over every aspect of your life in subservience to the state.

So, Hurray for California.  We, the People, need to take back our country and reassert our natural rights and severely limit the power, authority and control of government as was the vision and the genius of the framers of our Constitution.

Arthur Cooper

tyrannyalertWhat exactly do I mean by this title?  Am I saying that government agents are coming to American homes, one by one, seizing your prized possessions?  Am I saying that the government is taking away people’s homes? … Of course not.  Private Property represents all those life’s possessions we have earned, traded for, acquired or inherited throughout our lives.

However, take a close look at this list and tell me what you think is happening to our private property.

1.    Income Taxes - all those earning a living, above the poverty line, pay federal and state income taxes.  The rates generally range from 15% (a few pay 10%) to 35% depending on income level.  The top rate will rise to 40%+ with the expiration of the 2003 tax cuts in 2011.
2.    Payroll Taxes - another 6%+ of your income for the first 100+K of your income.  Payroll Taxes are supposed to go the Social Security Fund for you personally, but actually doesn’t.
3.    Medicare Taxes
4.    State Disability, Workmen’s Compensation and Unemployment Insurance Taxes collected by most states.
5.    Sales Taxes paid in most states.
6.    Property Taxes

Have I told anything you don’t already know?  Probably not or at least you haven’t looked at your gross income as your private property.  However, it surely is.  But none of these taxes existed 100 years ago.  We accept these taxes as part of the necessary truths we need to keep on going.  I am not proposing a ban on taxes as the government certainly needs funds from its citizens to provide for the defense and protection of the country and the states, to provide certain essential services to insure a free-flowing and increasingly efficient society.

However, since 1933, and now under great acceleration under the Obama Administration, the government has seized a huge new mantle of “rights” that government, not the individual, bestow on the individual; this is as if the individual doesn’t have his own set of natural rights and responsibilities without the oversight or interference by a controlling central government.

So, now we have a huge acceleration of the war on private property; in fact, I maintain that it is a direct war on the individual himself.

Consider these unfolding facts:

1.    Cap and Trade - if enacted, all carbon-based products, processes, manufacturing, et al will be strictly controlled through punitive tax policy.  This will trigger huge increases in the prices we all pay for everything we buy or use.  Few understand what this will mean and it will only be recognized when the individual sees their utility bills double or worse, food prices skyrocket, gasoline go shooting up.  Where will the money go … directly to the government.
2.   Universal Health Care - this is a multi-trillion dollar program dictated by a government seeking to further tax and ultimately control your life; under this socialized form of medicine, the individual is completely obliterated in favor of government control of exactly what health care will mean to you.  Choice of provider (doctor, hospital, therapist and therapy) will be taken from the individual and controlled by the government.  Statistics will be used instead of personal choice to justify and prescribe, what will be done, if it will be done, when it will be done and by whom it will be done.  Don’t let anyone tell you that the government will pay for it … the government never pays for it … you pay for it … just another part of your private property.
3.    New Taxes Forever - whether it is smoking, alcohol, sugar, fats, preservatives, travel, gasoline, investments and capital gains, your private property is under attack … relentlessly.  Even death carries a tax.
Why?  … why does the government, regardless of party to a greater or lesser degree, continually grab more and more of your private property?  Read “Liberty and Tyranny” by Mark Levin to get a very complete answer and insight.  However, it comes down to the willful determination of a central government to control and direct the lives of the individual.  Levin calls it the “statist” referring to the diminution of the individual and the absolute power of the state.  You can call this the death of the individual.  The government is seeking control of the banking system, insurance companies, the automobile industry, under the guise of protecting the public.  It is nothing like protecting the public however.  Freedom and free market capitalism is being wiped away.  The very essence of our Constitution is being trashed and ignored towards this inexorable drive to control our lives in every way possible.
What made this country great is the flow of immigrants coming to a new world to gain true freedom, to build a life for themselves, by themselves with equal opportunity to pursue life, liberty and happiness.  This country was born out of complete subservience to the individual and tight controls on the power of a central government; it was called Federalism and Reagen proposed a “new” Federalism 25 years ago to specifically reassert the principals and concepts of the US Constitution.

The statist is waging war on you and your private property.  It is up to the individual, one by one, to work together to oppose this assault on our personal freedoms, rights and responsibilities.

What do you think?

Arthur Cooper

21 May 2009

The War on Private Property

Author: admin | Filed under: Economy, Government, Politics

talkradioAs you realize, I am very concerned about the direction of our country.  The ever-growing power of the state reaching into our wallets, our bedrooms and who knows what else is diametrically opposed to virtually everything I ever learned about the US Constitution and what truly has made our country the greatest in the world.

There is no doubt that I agree with much of what is said on conservative talk shows like Limbaugh, Hannity and Mark Levin.  However, I am often deeply troubled at the tone or the style that the message is delivered in.  Sure, I am reminded by some that these gentlemen are also entertainers of sorts.  However, they are talking about very serious matters which are why I listen to them in the first place.  It’s also very important that the good debate, the honest debate be won by conservatives because it is only conservative ideas and policies that have brought great wealth, power and ideals to America.

So, for instance, when Sean Hannity plays the everyday attack dog by incessantly pointing out the same things … over and over again, it sours me because I feel it’s counterproductive to the good debate.  What good is it to show the slip-up of the oath of office that occurred on inauguration day?  Why resort to what the Keith Obermans, Dave Lettermans, Chris Matthews, et al did virtually every day of the Bush administration?  Why not take the higher road and just stick to principles?  Why is it still necessary for him to keep bringing up Ayres, Rev. Wright, etc?  How many times do you need to hear that to become convinced or have made your point?  Talking about the very same things on the radio and on TV for 200+ days prior to the election didn’t really change the result, did it? I don’t understand how it is that Hannity doesn’t seem to understand that you can’t expect to get different results by doing the same thing.  It seems to me that Hannity is actually part of the problem rather than breaking new ground in the hearts and minds of Americans.

Rush Limbaugh is the king of talk radio.  However controversial he may be, I have heard him speak about great things, great ideals and when he stays on message, he is as compelling a speaker as there is.  However, as with Hannity, Limbaugh uses inflammatory, provocative and derisive words to accentuate the negative when he speaks of the Liberal Left.  He also over-defended Bush, part of what I call the “Bush can do no wrong” crowd.  Surely, Limbaugh spoke of his disagreements with Bush but he did it with the respect and civility that we should all show all of our presidents including Obama and Bush.  He should do more of this with his ideological adversaries, regardless of how he or other conservatives are treated by the left.  Further, the name-calling; I won’t list them here because it bothers me so much.  Again, I make no excuses for the left as they are shameless in their derision of all things conservative, never more venomous than how they treated Bush.  However, using anything but their names is provocative and inflammatory; it just takes the low road which cheapens the real messages and lessons of conservatism.

Mark Levin just wrote a best-selling book, “Liberty and Tyranny,” which I just completed and I truly believe is a book that all Americans should read.  It is truly a primer to better understand the historic and constitutional significance of what is going on in our country now.  It is, as the tagline states, “A Conservative Manifesto.”  However, as with Mr. Limbaugh, on his radio broadcasts, Levin resorts to name-calling, angry diatribes and derisive pet names for those, particularly in government and the media that he disagrees with on the left.  It just cheapens his rich rich message and teachings.  He makes no excuses for this; he knows he’s doing it and he feels justified in doing it because he feels they deserve it.  I simply feel that they may deserve it but Mr. Levin would be so much more effective by sticking to his truly great understanding of the constitution and seek to teach what he knows to enrich everyone as he is so capable of doing.

These leading conservative talk show personalities have a great deal to offer.  They command strong followings and surely have the top ratings in their field.  It is hard to argue that they change anything as their success measured in all the numbers show that there should be no reason to change.  However, still, I suggest that they can still improve and be even more effective by lowering their voices some, sticking to their principles as they surely will, but also deliver a more polished and poised message, free of incessant repetition and name calling.  In this way, the message will not get lost or camouflaged; it will be clear and true.  The fact is that they will never lose an honest debate; I say let’s have the honest debate and not lower ourselves to the tactics of our ideological adversaries.

Arthur Cooper